Nonfiction | June 01, 1983
Lulu in Rochester: Self-Portrait of an Anti-Star
The full text of this essay is not currently available online.
In 1928 — at the age of 22 — Louise Brooks gave one of the best performances in the silent cinema as Lulu, an amoral woman of pleasure whose character had fascinated German artists since the 1890s. Director G.W. Pabst had searched for his star all over Europe, and he was ready to sign Marlene Dietrich when he heard that Louise Brooks, a refugee from Cherryvale, Kansas, a former Ziegfield girl and rising Paramount star, was willing to take the role. As Brooks recalls, contemporary critics complained that her performance was an utter blank: “Louise Brooks cannot act. She does not suffer. She does nothing.” But, this was precisely the point.
If you are a student, faculty member, or staff member at an institution whose library subscribes to Project Muse, you can read this piece and the full archives of the Missouri Review for free. Check this list to see if your library is a Project Muse subscriber.
Want to read more?
Subscribe TodaySEE THE ISSUE
SUGGESTED CONTENT
Nonfiction
Oct 07 2026
Perkoff Prize Winner: A House in the Woods
A House in the Woods Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, 2013 Little house in the woods. The phrase is so pastoral it almost yawns. But that’s what it turns out to be: two… read more
Nonfiction
Oct 07 2026
No Anguish in This House
No Anguish in This House I found Glen on a dating site called Green Singles. It was 2002 and Green Singles was one of the first dating sites that appeared… read more
Nonfiction
Oct 07 2026
My Search for Life
My Search for Life In a giant metal tank colder than nightfall on the moon, the seeds of human life lie in wait. Liquid nitrogen keeps them frozen in time.… read more